Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246842, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1099924

ABSTRACT

Face masks are an important tool for preventing the spread of COVID-19. However, it is unclear how different types of masks affect speech recognition in different levels of background noise. To address this, we investigated the effects of four masks (a surgical mask, N95 respirator, and two cloth masks) on recognition of spoken sentences in multi-talker babble. In low levels of background noise, masks had little to no effect, with no more than a 5.5% decrease in mean accuracy compared to a no-mask condition. In high levels of noise, mean accuracy was 2.8-18.2% lower than the no-mask condition, but the surgical mask continued to show no significant difference. The results demonstrate that different types of masks generally yield similar accuracy in low levels of background noise, but differences between masks become more apparent in high levels of noise.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Masks , Speech Perception/physiology , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/transmission , Female , Humans , Language , Male , Masks/adverse effects , N95 Respirators/adverse effects , Noise , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Speech/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL